Examples / evidence stories

Follow the research question all the way to its limitations.

Examples connect isolated concepts into complete reasoning chains. Public examples use synthetic or explicitly publishable data and emphasize interpretation rather than headline results.

Example outputs are illustrative. They are not recommendations, forecasts, or demonstrations of future performance.
Evidence story / never end at the winner
01Questiondefine before results
02Selectionshow the family
03Holdoutreserve evidence
04Validationstress the claim
05Interpretwhat changed?
06Limitationswhat remains?
Example 001 · synthetic

Does a selected candidate remain stable outside the window that selected it?

This first complete public case study follows a synthetic selected candidate from development through reserved evidence, time-aware checks, uncertainty analysis, limitations, and the next research question.

1 · Question

State what is being tested

Define the selection rule and what “stable” means before looking at the held-out evidence.

2 · Setup

Separate development from evaluation

Use synthetic candidate data and preserve a holdout boundary so the example can teach the difference clearly.

3 · Evidence

Show the population

Inspect the selected candidate in the context of the broader family instead of presenting one result in isolation.

4 · Validation

Apply time-aware checks

Compare multiple held-out windows and sequence-sensitive diagnostics rather than treating one split as definitive.

5 · Interpretation

Explain what changed

Describe where the evidence agrees or disagrees and avoid converting a diagnostic into a certainty claim.

6 · Limitations

Name what the test cannot prove

Document selection effects, assumptions, data limitations, and the next question that remains unanswered.

Example 002 · synthetic / interactive

Can a replay chart accidentally know the future?

Move a synthetic historical cutoff and compare an information-safe chart with an explicitly invalid view that leaves future bars visible.

Information boundary

Hide what was not knowable yet

See how the admissible chart shrinks when the replay cutoff moves backward.

Invalid comparison

Make leakage visible

Future bars stay faintly visible only in the comparison panel so the error is obvious.

Why examples need their own area

Docs answers “what does this do?” and Methods answers “what does this mean?” Examples answer “how do these ideas fit together in a complete research argument?” That is a different job and deserves a dedicated format.